Toyota Motor chief executive Akio Toyoda apologized Friday for the problems that led to the company’s recall of more than 8 million cars. But he did not announce any solution for brake problems of its popular Prius hybrid.
Toyoda, the grandson of the company’s founder, made his first public appearance in the two weeks that the company has faced a growing crisis over the safety and quality of its vehicles.
The recall affected 8.1 million vehicles worldwide and will cost the company an estimated $2 billion in repair costs and lost sales due to a sticking accelerator. Toyota has not said how much the new problems with the braking system in the Prius will cost it, though.
Toyoda said an investigation of the Prius problems is under way, and a decision on whether there will be another recall will be announced as soon as possible.
The company also announced Friday it is looking at the brake systems of the latest Lexus hybrid vehicles as well as a Japanese model called the Sai — because they use the same system as the one on the 2010 Prius.
But Toyoda denied the company has been trying to hide problems with the brakes from safety officials in the United States and Japan. Still, he admitted Toyota needed to do more to assure customers about the safety of its vehicles.
"I feel we are in stormy weather," he said. "Under this situation, [we] must regain customer trust. Tackle the problem. My role is to carry it out. We lacked customer perspective. It’s very unfortunate."
Not going far enough. But one expert said Toyota and its chief made a mistake by not announcing a recall for the Prius, especially since it now is clear there is a problem that will eventually need to be fixed.
"What we heard this morning was more foot dragging," said Michelle Krebs, senior analyst for auto sales Web site Edmunds.com. "They still are not very forthcoming. I think it’d be in their best interest to do a recall, and get it all behind them."
Other experts agreed that Toyota is suffering greater damage by not getting all the bad news out as quickly as possible.
"For reasons we may never learn, Toyota appears to be pulling their bandage very slowly, and therefore keeping their recall situation…firmly in the public eye," said James Bell, executive market analyst for Kelley Blue Book.
Krebs said that while most Toyota customers appear to be staying loyal to the brand for now, the damage being done to its image could hit future sales. She believes Toyota’s estimates of a loss of 80,000 sales in North America and another 20,000 in Europe due to the recall are probably too low.
"My impression is they are fairly tone deaf about how significant this is in the U.S.," she said. "I don’t think they have a good sense of what it’s going to cost them in terms of reputation and sales."
She added that problems with the Prius are a particularly tough blow to Toyota — even though the number of hybrids affected is insignificant compared to the 8.1 million vehicles recalled due to the gas pedal concerns.
"The Prius is so important to them. It’s the pinnacle of their technological knowledge and engineering prowess. Now that image has been tarnished," she said.
Toyoda has faced harsh criticism over the last two weeks about his lack of public appearances during the crisis. Krebs said it was important for him to finally speak to the public.
The tone of the news conference, which took place late Friday night in Japan, was very out of character with what is normally seen at corporate press conferences in Japan. Reporters did not show the typical deference to a top executive. Some demanded answers about why there is no leadership and why the company was dodging questions.
Toyoda said the company would set up a committee to examine problems that led to the recall and said the company would cooperate with U.S. authorities who are looking into problems with Toyota vehicles.
"Believe me, Toyota’s cars are safe," he said.
No solution yet for brake problem. The company has admitted it had a problem with the software controlling the anti-lock braking system of the 2010 model year Prius. The company said earlier this week that it has changed the software for cars produced since January, and it is looking into what to do with the vehicles already on the road.
Jesse Toprak, analyst with TrueCar.com, said the delay in announcing a recall for the Prius is a sign that fixing vehicles already on the road won’t be as simple as fixing ones coming off the assembly line. But he said Toyota would be better off announcing the recall even if a solution is not finalized.
"Normally it would have been better off to wait for a solution. It doesn’t help your image to say you don’t know how to fix your own cars. But these are not normal times for Toyota," he said.
The 2010 model year Prius went on sale in the middle of last year. There are an estimated 37,000 of the cars on the road in the United States, and more than 200,000 worldwide. It is the best-selling vehicle in Japan and Toyota’s fourth-best selling model in the U.S.
There have been 124 reports of problems with the brakes on the Prius in the United States, according to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, which Thursday announced it had launched a formal defect investigation into the car. There have been reports of four accidents involving the Prius brakes, two of which had injuries, although there have been no reported fatalities.
Toyota, which achieved steady market share growth in the United States due to its reputation of strong vehicle quality and safety, has been criticized by U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood for being slow to respond to the latest problems. LaHood said Toyota did not move on the accelerator recall until pushed to do so by U.S. safety officials.
The Prius brake problem causes a delay of about a second in the brakes engaging, but during a second a car traveling 60 m.p.h. can travel almost 100 feet.
While Toyota (TM) has far greater financial resources than most of its rivals, especially its U.S. rivals General Motors, Ford Motor (F, Fortune 500) and Chrysler Group, the quality issues do pose a financial challenge for the company. Friday credit rating agency Standard & Poor’s placed its debt on credit watch, meaning it faces the risk of a downgrade that could raise its borrowing costs.
"Standard & Poor’s believes that these developments may affect the company’s reputation for quality, weakening its competitive position," it said in the announcement.
CNN’s Kyung Lah contributed to this report.
Compare health insurance plans and insurance rates on family and individual health insurance. Free health quotes and more.
Huge losses in the Small Business Administration’s main loan program have led President Barack Obama to propose phasing out the government subsidy for 7(a) loans beginning in fiscal 2012.
This would force the agency to support its government-guaranteed loans by charging higher fees on borrowers and lenders. That’s what occurred when Congress ended the subsidy for 7(a) loans – at President George W. Bush’s request – in 2004. Congress restored the subsidy this fiscal year, at a cost of $80 million.
The economic stimulus bill provided the SBA with an additional $375 million to waive fees for borrowers on most 7(a) loans and 504 loans, which mostly finance real estate, and increase the government guarantee on SBA loans from the typical 75 percent to 90 percent. Those enhancements made the loans more affordable for borrowers and less risky for lenders, enabling SBA lending to rebound after cratering during the financial crisis.
SBA loans are an important source of credit for small businesses that can’t obtain conventional loans.
In December, Congress came up with another $125 million to extend the fee reductions and higher loan guarantee until the end of February. Obama wants Congress to pass additional legislation extending them through Sept. 30, the end of the fiscal year.
The president’s budget proposal for next fiscal year, however, reveals that defaults on SBA loans have exploded over the past year, costing the government a projected $4.5 billion. Most of the problem loans were made between 2005 and 2007.
The administration proposes a $165 million subsidy for 7(a) loans next year, double this year’s subsidy if economic stimulus funds are excluded.
Beginning in 2012, however, Obama wants to give the SBA “the flexibility to adjust fees in the program to enable it to be self-sustaining over time,” according to the president’s budget plan. This would “strengthen the program’s long-term economic foundation,” the budget plan states.
Default rates for 7(a) loans aren’t much worse than the default rates for conventional loans, said Tony Wilkinson, president and CEO of the National Association of Government Guaranteed Lenders, which represents SBA lenders.
If the economy improves, default rates should fall, he said. A better business climate also could make an end to the government subsidy for 7(a) loans bearable, he said.
Free online car insurance quotes. Get insurance rate comparisons, and buy your auto insurance policy instantly.
The Arizona Cardinals well get some high-profile home games next season — including contests against the Dallas Cowboys, Denver Broncos and Oakland Raiders.
The Cardinals’ 2010 regular season schedule lineup is set in terms of teams but dates and times and what kind of national games the Cards will be play will be determined later this year. The Cardinals will also host the New Orleans Saints, Tampa Bay Buccaneers and games against NFC West foes (San Francisco 49ers, St. Louis Rams and Seattle Seahawks).
High-profile teams such as the Cowboys, Broncos and Raiders all have strong followings in the Phoenix sports market, which should insure quick sellouts for those games and push up ticket prices next year free business cards.
The Cardinals have sold out all their home games since moving from Tempe to Glendale’s University of Phoenix Stadium in 2006.
The Cards' road games include visits to San Diego, Minnesota, Atlanta, Kansas City, Carolina and the NFC West rivals.
The NFL playoffs start this weekend and include a 2:30 p.m. Sunday game between the Cardinals and Green Bay Packers that will be televised by Fox.
Jamie Naessens thought so. She used her credit card to get a free sample of a tooth whitener advertised as cheaper than visiting a dentist.
"A friend of mine on Facebook posted about a product she was happy with that she got for free," she says. "Her account was hacked, but I didn’t know until later."
She went to the website, www.premiumwhitepro.com, and agreed to pay $1.95 (U.S.) to cover shipping costs. But a confirmation email showed $11.90 charged to her credit card.
"We charge an extra $9.50 for international orders," she was told after calling the Colorado-based company for a live chat on the night she did the transaction.
Only when she asked to cancel did she find out that accepting the trial order could have trapped her in a monthly shipping program.
"If you don’t cancel, you will be billed $87.62 for the product and you’ll then become a PremiumWhite Celebrity Member," the website says.
Naessens cancelled the trial order, but the company insisted the $11.90 shipping charge was non-refundable. Luckily, she had a screen shot of her live chat and sent it to her credit card issuer, President’s Choice Financial.
She also cancelled her credit card and asked for a new one to be issued with a new number.
Erin Gray, a President’s Choice spokeswoman, said customers have to take precautions against online scams.
"Ms. Naessens was reimbursed for the charge she incurred from the company," Gray said. "By taking the extra step of closing her card and opening a new one, she should avoid further charges related to the online offer.
"Should the company proceed with charging the card again, we will certainly work with Ms. Naessens to find a resolution (including adjusting the charge)."
Complaints about recurring charges by merchants often have the same result No teletrack payday loans. Customers have to call their credit card issuer every month and file a dispute.
This happens despite guarantees by Visa and MasterCard against unauthorized purchases made in a store, over the phone or online.
Naessens feels a little foolish, but a lot wiser, about how credit card companies operate.
"I have always considered myself a fairly smart consumer. However, I’ve been humbled recently.
"I feel that credit card issuers are not committed to changing the system to protect consumers.
"It is true that the issuer has promised to work with me in the future. However, that is not the same as making a promise to reverse any future charges, even though I did everything I could possibly do, given the situation.
"The very fact that suspect merchants can resubmit the charges is unacceptable — and once again, the consumer is victimized."
Naessens had one more surprise. She joined a security group at Facebook to share her experience.
But she couldn’t comment online without verifying her Facebook account. This meant having to provide her cellphone number, so she could be sent a text message with a security code.
"I’d already compromised my credit card number. I wasn’t going to do that with my cellphone number," she says.
Internet user beware. A free sample is a common come-on for monthly shipments of vitamins or cosmetics. And if you complain, the company will say you agreed to the terms and conditions before placing your order.
Next week, we’ll wrap up this Sunday series on fraud before tackling something new in the new year.
eroseman@thestar.ca
Nortel Networks Corp. pensioners reacted with disgust on Friday to reports of new lavish bonuses for the company’s top executives.
It was yet another blow to Nortel’s distressed pensioners, retirees and long-term disabled former employees, who have dealt with financial uncertainty since the former Canadian tech darling declared bankruptcy in January.
“It seems so aberrant, in terms of the executive of the company awarding themselves really, really rich pay raises for doing the job of taking the company apart,” said Tony Marsh, who retired from Nortel in 2000 after 30 years.
“Those of us who built the company up, into arguably the world’s No. 1 telecom company, could never have dreamed of such riches,” Marsh added.
An internal Nortel file “outlines a new compensation scheme for 72 Nortel executives that will see them get a total of $7.5 million U.S. on top of their current salaries in 2009,” according to CBC News.
The company has argued that bonuses are necessary to keep executives aboard what is essentially a sinking ship following Nortel’s filing for bankruptcy protection and the subsequent selling off of the company’s assets.
Nortel would not comment on details of the plan. It issued a statement saying: “As Nortel works through the highly complex tasks of this restructuring, it is critical to have the right specialist resources in place … Any steps taken around these individuals has been within the context of a previously approved compensation plan, taken in consultation with the creditor committees, external legal counsel and the Canadian Monitor.”
Earlier, former CEO Mike Zafirovski claimed $12.3 million (U.S.) for back pay and bonuses. In March, some 100 executives were awarded $45 million in retention bonuses.
The company’s divisions are being auctioned off in a process dragged out by bankruptcy court approvals. Retirees are worried that when Nortel’s various global divisions are entirely sold off, they will be stuck with even less than they are now, which is not much, Marsh said.
The Federal Reserve should keep alive its asset purchase programs beyond the first quarter of 2010 to give policy-makers more flexibility if the economy took another turn for the worse, a senior Fed official said on Sunday.
“I would just like to keep them active at a very low level. It would give the Fed the option to react if the economy weakened,” St. Louis Federal Reserve bank James Bullard told reporters after his speech at an event organized by Princeton University students in New York.
“When you are trying to think how the economy might evolve, it could be that the economy comes in very strong … or it could go the other way payday loan. There is a lot of uncertainty. I’d hate to get the feeling that the Fed is saying our work is done. We need a policy that can react either way,” Bullard said.
The Federal Reserve cut interest rates to near zero last December and has kept them there since. At its last policy-setting meeting the central bank reiterated its pledge to keep interest rates “extraordinarily low” for an “extended period”.
Bullard said it could be helpful to have a discussion on what the term “extended period” means.
Amelia A.J. Bond is opening a St. Louis office for George K. Baum & Co., a Kansas City-based public finance firm.
Bond worked as managing director and head of public finance for Wachovia Securities for two years after its merger with A.G. Edwards in 2007. Before the merger, she served for seven years as senior vice president and director of public finance for A.G. Edwards.
While leading the A.G. Edwards public finance department from 2001 to 2007, Bond supervised the doubling of annual revenue for the department.
From 2003 to 2006, Bond served on the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, the regulator for U.S. municipal bonds, and she was elected by fellow board members to serve as its chairman during the 2005-2006 fiscal year. She is only the second woman to have held that position in the organization’s 30-year history.
British Airways’ pension fund deficit could yet scupper its planned merger with Spain’s Iberia, as the UK airline still has to agree the size of the multi-billion pound shortfall with the fund’s trustees.
Iberia, which on Friday posted a bigger than expected nine-month operating loss, agreed with BA on Thursday to create a group with a combined market value of $7 billion as they continue to battle the worst industry downturn in decades.
But BA’s pension deficit was one of the main stumbling blocks in the 16-month merger talks and was a key negotiating point for Iberia, which is reserving the right to back out of the deal if the funding hole turns out to be bigger than the 3 billion pounds ($5 billion) which analysts have forecast.
BA pension trustees undertook a triennial review of the pension scheme earlier this year but the results have yet to be announced, with BA saying it expects to agree a figure with the trustees in the next two to three months.
“The market will be looking at the discount rate used by BA’s trustees to calculate its pension liabilities. You’d expect them to use a favorable one to help push the deal through though, especially since the deficit is bigger than its market value right now” a London-based analyst said.
“There’s still a risk that the deal will fall through. It’s all hanging on BA’s negotiating weight with the trustees over its pension,” a Madrid-based equities sales trader said.
By 1200 GMT Iberia’s shares were 2.4 percent lower at 2.16 euros, after Thursday’s 12 percent gain, while BA was 1.4 percent higher at 217.8 pence.
Some analysts said they were surprised that the terms of a deal had even been announced before the pension issue has been resolved faxless payday loan.
Analysts believe BA could insure all or part of its liabilities through a buy-out deal with a specialized insurer or hedge specific risks such as the longevity of pensioners through a swap deal or pledge contingent assets such as its real estate.
The new company will combine British Airways’ strong position in Europe-to-North America traffic with Iberia’s Latin American business, and will potentially be reinforced by a planned alliance with AMR Corp’s American Airlines.
So far the deal looks set to give BA shareholders 55 percent of the new company, effectively giving it control, but the balance of power remains in question and could shift in Iberia’s favor depending on the outcome of BA’s talks with trustees over its pension deficit.
The BA-Iberia format mirrors the ground-breaking 2004 merger of Air France and KLM, which airline industry executives describe as a back-office merger designed mainly to slash costs.
Under this model, the airlines would maintain their own fleets and networks, which operate under the banner of national traffic rights, but would be owned by a common holding company.
“This is a five-year plan to get through the crisis and generate cash, and then BA will firmly take the driving seat,” said Enrique Quemanda, Chief Executive of boutique investment firm ONEtoONE.
The pair, who have targeted annual synergies of about 400 million euros by the end of the fifth year, will combine BA’s strong position in north Atlantic traffic with Iberia’s Latin American business, which will potentially be reinforced by a planned alliance with American Airlines.
U.S. Bancorp is probably the biggest bank you’ve never heard of. But there are two reasons why you might want to start paying attention to it.
It is about to get bigger and it’s also a favorite investment of some guy in Omaha whose name you probably do know: Warren Buffett.
On Friday, U.S. Bancorp agreed to buy the nine banks that were part of FBOP, a privately held multibank holding company that failed and was seized by the FDIC.
As a result of the deal, U.S. Bancorp will add $18.4 billion in FBOP’s assets and 150 branches spread throughout California, Illinois, Texas and Arizona. This acquisition is U.S. Bancorp’s fourth purchase of a failed bank or savings and loan since last November. Including FBOP, U.S. Bancorp has added nearly $35 billion in assets and about $27.7 billion in consumer deposits.
Still, U.S. Bancorp (USB, Fortune 500) doesn’t get nearly the attention that other big banks receive, despite the fact that it has $265 billion in assets and is the sixth-largest commercial bank in the country.
While its bigger rivals JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) were all singled out to receive $25 billion in "rescue" money as part of the first installment of TARP funds last fall, U.S. Bancorp had to wait and apply for TARP just like other smaller banks.
It received $6.6 billion in bailout funds last year but it also was one of the first big banks to return taxpayer money.
In June, U.S. Bancorp was one of 10 banks that took part in regulators’ stress tests earlier this year that was given a relatively clean bill of health.
That might be one reason why Warren Buffett is such a big fan of U.S. Bancorp. As of June 30, Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRKA, Fortune 500) owned 69 million shares in the bank, a 3.6% stake. That makes Berkshire the fourth-largest owner in U.S. Bancorp. What’s more, U.S. Bancorp is Berkshire’s tenth-biggest holding.
The bank has held up remarkably well during the credit crisis and recession. It has posted a profit in each of the past five quarters.
And the stock, like that of other Berkshire bank holdings such as Wells Fargo and Buffalo’s M&T Bank (MTB), has responded to the relatively strong results. The stock has more than doubled since the market hit its low point of the year in early March, outperforming the big gains at many of its regional bank rivals.
Investors appeared to like the news of the FBOP (not to be confused with the annoying Hanson song MMMBop from a decade ago) acquisition as well. The stock was up about 2% in midday trading Monday.
So if Warren Buffett thinks so highly of U.S. Bancorp, does it make sense for your portfolio. It might. The stock does trade at a higher valuation on both a price-to-earnings and price-to-book value basis than many other large regional banks.
But Frank Barkocy, director of research with Mendon Capital Advisors, an investment firm that focuses mainly on financial stocks and owns shares of U.S. Bancorp, said the stock is worth it.
"The stock does sell at a premium to the banking group and that might frighten some investors away but we think it’s one of the better managed financial institutions out there," Barkocy said. "You get what you pay for. U.S. Bancorp is a consistent quality performer."
Barkocy added that the purchase for FBOP will give U.S. Bancorp a small, but important, foothold in Texas. It is taking over three branches in the Lone Star State as a result of the deal.
That obviously isn’t a whole lot right now but it could allow U.S. Bancorp to expand more in Texas, which is a key banking market that has not been hit as hard as the rest of the country during the wave of bank failures over the past two years.
Of course, the bank is not perfect. It’s a bank after all. U.S. Bancorp reported last month that its non-performing loans and net charge-offs tied to bad loans rose in the third quarter.
But the pace of loans going sour is starting to slow. That’s a good sign. And U.S. Bancorp’s credit quality has been much higher throughout the credit crisis than most of its peers.
As of the end of September, non-performing assets made up 2.4% of total loans. By way of comparison, the non-performing asset to loan ratio for Bank of America was 3.7% in the third quarter.
"Part of the dilemma with banks is there a degree of the numbers being a black box. But U.S. Bancorp didn’t wind up with as much junk in their portfolio. That intrigued us," said Don Yacktman, manager of the Yacktman fund and Yacktman Focused fund. U.S. Bancorp is a holding in both funds.
Add all that up and it shows that not all banks mucked it up royally during the housing boom and resulting bust. Some banks have somehow managed to continue growing without taking on ridiculous levels of risk.
So it looks like there’s a good chance U.S. Bancorp will continue to impress Buffett and the rest of its shareholders.
Talkback: Do you think it makes sense to follow the investing advice of Warren Buffett? Share your comments below.
Stocks slumped Friday, in a broad-based selloff that was especially hard on the leaders of the most recent leg of the rally — banks, energy shares and transportation companies.
The Dow Jones industrial average (INDU) lost 109 points, or 1.1%. The S&P 500 (SPX) index lost 13 points or 1.2%. The Nasdaq composite (COMP) lost 11 points or 0.5%.
Stocks had risen in the morning after upbeat results from Microsoft and Amazon.com, and an encouraging reading on existing home sales. But the tone turned negative in the afternoon.
The three major indexes all ended lower for the week, after two weeks of gains amid a bigger multi-month advance.
"After seven months of mostly rallying, the buyers weren’t really here this week and the bears took that as an opportunity," said Paul Brigandi, vice president of trading at Direxion Funds.
Investors getting tired?: Since bottoming at a 12-year low on March 9, the S&P 500 has surged over 62% through its rally high earlier this week.
Although repeated predictions for a big 10% to 15% selloff haven’t materialized, smaller selloffs of 1% to 3% have popped up periodically during the past 7 months. Friday appeared to be an extension of that trend.
While the S&P 500 lost 1.1% Friday, for individual sectors, the declines were bigger.
The Dow Jones Transportation (DJT) average, which includes railroads, truckers and airlines, had surged 88% through its rally high earlier this week. On Friday it lost 3.5%.
Some market pros have said the rise in the transports is a good indicator of the economic recovery. But downbeat comments Friday from railroads Union Pacific and Burlington Northern put that optimism into question. It also gave investors an opportunity to cash out after the massive rise in the sector.
The KBW Bank (BKX) index, which tracks 20 financial firms, including Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500), has rallied over 140% between March and its peak this week. The bank sector slumped as well Friday, losing 1.6%.
A strong U.S. dollar — bouncing back from one-year lows against a slew of other currencies — added to the downturn Friday. A strong dollar pressures dollar-traded commodities including oil, which in turn drags on energy shares. Big multinationals that benefit from a weak dollar also slipped.
Stocks had rallied Thursday following upbeat earnings from 3M (MMM, Fortune 500), AT&T (T, Fortune 500) and other blue chips. The advance propelled the Dow back above 10,000 and the S&P 500 closer to 1,100. But that advance proved unsustainable Friday, even though corporate news was upbeat.
"Investors know that the earnings for the third quarter are going to be better than expected," Brigandi said. "That’s no longer going to be a catalyst. They are going to want to see something else."
Results: Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) reported weaker quarterly sales and income Friday morning that easily surpassed analysts’ estimates. Cost cutting and strong sales of its Windows operating system fueled the advance.
On Thursday, Microsoft rolled out its new Windows 7 operating system, expected to boost PC sales in the coming months.
Shares of Microsoft, a Dow component, rose over 9% Friday morning, touching a one-year high, before giving up nearly half of that advance.
Late Thursday, Dow component American Express (AXP, Fortune 500) reported weaker quarterly sales and earnings that beat analysts’ forecasts. Shares fell 5% Friday.
Also late Thursday, Amazon.com (AMZN, Fortune 500) reported a big surge in earnings and revenue, thanks in part to strong sales of its e-reader, Kindle. Shares jumped 27% Friday, hitting a ten-year high.
So far, 199 companies, or 40% of the S&P 500, have reported results. Profits are currently on track to have fallen 18.2% versus a year earlier, according to the latest from Thomson Reuters. Revenue is expected to have dropped over 10% from a year ago.
Bernanke: The Federal Reserve chairman, speaking Friday, said that the financial turmoil is abating, but that lawmakers have to reform the system to help prevent a crisis of this magnitude happening again.
On Thursday, the Federal Reserve proposed a broad overhaul of pay policies at 28 of the largest U.S. banks. Also Thursday, White House "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg called for the seven biggest recipients of federal bailout money to cut in half what they pay their top executives.
Economy: Existing home sales jumped to a 5.57 million unit annual rate in September, according to a National Association of Realtors report released Friday morning. Sales were expected to have risen to a 5.35 million unit annual rate from 5.1 million unit annual rate in August.
World markets: Global markets were mixed. In Europe, London’s FTSE 100 gained 0.7%, France’s CAC 40 lost 0.3% and Germany’s DAX gave up 0.4%. Asian markets ended higher.
Bonds: Treasury prices tumbled, raising the yield on the 10-year note to 3.48% from 3.42% late Thursday. Treasury prices and yields move in opposite directions.
Currency and commodities: The dollar gained versus the euro, after falling to a 14-month low earlier in the week. The dollar gained versus the yen.
U.S. light crude oil for December delivery fell 69 cents to settle at $80.50 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange, edging off a one-year high.
COMEX gold for December delivery fell $2.20 to settle at $1,056.40 an ounce. Gold has surpassed records repeatedly this month due to the weak dollar and longer-term worries about inflation.
Powered by WordPress -- XHTML 1.0